Once upon a time, a man stood before the gates of a marketplace, his heart full of desires and his wallet full of—well, permission slips.
He turned to the heavens and cried: “I am sovereign of my own soul! Master of my fate! Captain of my—”
“Darling,” came the voice from behind, “put back the fishing rod.”
And so he did.
The ancient Chanakya, that cunning minister of empires, once wrote that the wise ruler must control the treasury to control the kingdom. He said nothing—nothing—about what happens when the treasury controller is the one who also decides what you eat for dinner. This, even Chanakya could not strategize around.
Confucius taught that harmony in the household is the foundation of harmony in the state. His student once asked, “Master, what if harmony means I simply agree to everything?” Confucius paused for a very long time. Some say he is still pausing.
In the Javanese tradition, they say “swarga nunut, neraka katut”—in heaven you follow, in hell you’re dragged along. The husband heard this and thought: this also describes grocery shopping.
The Stoic Epictetus declared: “It is not things that disturb us, but our judgments about things.” And so the man looked at his empty hands and said, “I am not poor. I am merely pre-approved for nothing.“
Marcus Aurelius, emperor of Rome, commander of legions, wrote in his private journal: “Accept the things to which fate binds you.” Scholars have debated what fate he meant. Husbands have never debated at all. They know.
The Sufi poet Rumi sang that love dissolves the self entirely, that the lover becomes nothing before the beloved. His ecstatic verses were about divine annihilation. But any married man reading “I have become nothing, nothing, nothing” simply nods and whispers: “Yes, especially after the monthly bills.”
Lao Tzu, that old sage who rode a water buffalo into the mist, wrote in the Tao Te Ching:
“The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.”
Similarly, the budget that can be asked about is not the real budget. The real budget exists in a purse you cannot open, in a spreadsheet you cannot find, governed by calculations that transcend human mathematics. You may call it the Tao of the Household. You may not call it anything else, because the naming rights also belong to her.
Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly, free and unburdened. Then he woke and did not know if he was a man who had dreamed of being a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming of being a man. The husband dreamed he had money. Then he woke. He was quite certain which one was the dream.
In the Mahabharata, the great Yudhishthira was asked: “What is the greatest wonder in the world?” He answered: “Every day, men see others fall, yet each believes he himself will live forever.”
But there is a greater wonder still: every month, the husband sees the salary arrive in his account, and every month, it vanishes before he can blink. And yet—and yet—he continues to believe that next month will be different.
The Buddha called this tanha—craving, the root of suffering. He prescribed detachment. The husband has achieved detachment. Not by meditation. The bank account simply detached itself from him first.
Al-Ghazali, that towering scholar of Islam, wrote of tawakkul—absolute trust in God’s provision. The husband practices a domestic version: absolute trust that his wife has, somewhere, a plan. He does not understand the plan. He has never seen the plan. But the children are fed, the house stands, the cats are suspiciously well-groomed, and somehow there is always exactly enough. This, the husband has learned, is its own kind of miracle.
Kahlil Gibran wrote: “You give but little when you give of your possessions. It is when you give of yourself that you truly give.”
The husband has given of his possessions. And of himself. And also his card. And his PIN number. And yet he is told he does not give enough attention. The philosophers did not prepare him for this.
But here, dear readers, is the deepest truth, the one the sages whisper only to those ready to hear:
Socrates, the wisest man in Athens, was asked how he became so wise. He said it was because he knew that he knew nothing. His wife Xanthippe was legendary for her fierce temperament. Coincidence? The ancient sources are suspiciously silent.
Perhaps true wisdom is not knowing that you know nothing.
Perhaps true wisdom is having nothing—because someone wiser is holding it for you, keeping it safe from your impulses, your fishing rods, your seventeenth tea set, your “but it was on sale”—
And perhaps, just perhaps, the man who says “my budget is in my wife’s hand” is not a man defeated.
He is a man liberated.
For as the Tao teaches: the river does not struggle against the banks. The banks are what give the river its direction, its power, its purpose. Without them, it is merely a flood—wide, shallow, and going nowhere.
So it is with the husband’s salary.
The man stood again before the marketplace. His heart was still full of desires. His wallet was still full of permission slips.
But he smiled.
Because the house was warm, the children were laughing, the cats were inexplicably fat, and somewhere in the quiet architecture of a budget he could not see, everything was exactly enough.
He walked home empty-handed and full-hearted.
And the tea his wife had already prepared was waiting.
“The wise man’s treasure is not in his pocket, but in knowing whose pocket to trust.”
— attributed to no philosopher in particular, but understood by every husband universally.
Bhyllabus l'énigme 
Tinggalkan komentar